Health Reform “Roundhouse” Tax employees are not expecting

by admin on April 7, 2010

There is a “roundhouse” tax that will come out of nowhere and knock employees on their cans if their employer decides to pay the $2000.00 penalty to the government and allow their employees to buy insurance at the “exchange.”

obamacare 1 Health Reform Roundhouse Tax employees are not expecting

To begin with, an employer that is paying the health premiums for their employees as part of their benefit pay package will most likely choose to give their employees raises and do away with company insured health care.

Some excerpts from the True Cost blog

  • Employers with less than 50 employees face no penalties.
  • Employers with more than 50 employees that provide no health care coverage must pay a tax of $2000 per employee (with the first 30 employees being exempt)
  • Employers with more than 50 employees that do provide care may have to pay a tax 0f up to $2000 per employee if  their employees use the new health care exchange subsidies.
  • Here are some of the employer options with the above variables  in play..

  • Drop Employee Coverage: A company drops its health care plan, paying the $2k per head tax and leaving employees to buy their own plans. The company will save $10,000 per employee on average given the average cost of health insurance [1], and will also save by eliminating benefits administration expenses. The company could give each employee a $9000 raise and still increase profit by $500 or more per employee [2]. Employees will be mad about the loss of benefits, but not too mad as they can get coverage on the exchange using their new income and potentially subsidies.
  • Keep Employee Coverage: The company will face the administrative burden of supplying vouchers to some employees who would like to opt out, of complying with minimum benefits requirements, and will potentially still have to pay $2000 in fines per employee if its health care plan is deemed insufficient. The company’s use of benefits as a recruiting tool will be diminished once benefits can be obtained on the health care exchange.
  • If an employer elects to drop coverage and give their employees raises with the money they were spending on health insurance premiums, would that not create more tax revenue for the government as employees are boosted into a higher tax bracket (which is the worst of all worlds)

    Keep in mind that the government has been wanting to tax the health benefits people receive from their job site for many moons.  With this new Obamacare package coming on line it will give government much need revenue at the expense of the middle class.

    The true cost blog continues…

    An employer could cancel insurance, saving $10,000 per employee, and then give each employee a $9000 raise. Payroll taxes (7.65%) would add another $688 to this sum, leaving a net profit of $312 per employee if an employer took this approach. Benefits administration expenses would also be eliminated, however, and these savings could be significant. Eliminating a single $40,000 salary HR position at a 200 person company would save another $200 per employee, for instance. So a net profit of over $500 per employee is quite possible – the actual profitability of the move would depend on how much of the health care savings the company chose to pass on in the form of higher wages for its employees

    Related posts:

    1. Obama’s way of Paying for Health Care (for all)
    2. Americans for Tax Reform:Tax Hikes 6 months away
    3. Do Health Reform Right
    4. Marriage Penalty in the Health Reform Bill
    5. Health Insurance Reform in South Carolina as I see it. Personal opinion only

    Leave a Comment

    CommentLuv badge

    Previous post:

    Next post: